Skip to content
Judges were told not to publish their jobs on social media, amid an increase in physical threats via the Internet.
Barauna Car, head of judges, the largest judges in England and Wales, is preparing a work team to consider ways to increase the security of the judges, physically and online.
In a letter to the judges in England and Wales, the work group announced, she said it was “increasingly anxious” about social media threats and misuse of the judiciary.
“Since many of you will be aware, incidents that threaten or drop the judicial safety have become very common, inside and outside the courtroom and on the Internet as well as materialism. She said:” Any accident in which your security is exposed to the maximum of seriousness. “
She said that the new operational security group “will not only look at the threats of physical security in the courts and courts, but also threats and online abuse, and threats to the home and the family.”
Baroneh Car is the largest judge in England and Wales – Lyon Neil
Baroneh Car was martyred with updated “installed” guidelines Social media Used by the judiciary, which states: “Do not indicate, or even hints, until you are a judge in your personal file on social media or anything you post on social media.”
It is advised not to publish or share personal details, and to avoid publishing pictures that can determine where they live and not “the assumption that your use of social media is truly especially or that it cannot be determined as a judge.”
The advice, which the telegraph saw, says they should be aware of the dangers of identifying identity and that people may not be how they seem to be on social media. “People with clarity, friends, or non -friendly can” detect information about yourself. “
Baroneh Carr Al -Qudah told that security protocols dealing with “people who are likely to be violent” are also updated. This included panic buttons, outside emergency and judicial orders that prohibit the risk participants from the court.
He admitted that he is guilty of assault
The upgrade in physical security follows an attack on Patrick Perusco, a senior judge in the Family Court, who was assaulted during a hearing in the Milton Keynes provincial court and beaten with Barida. His attacker, who represented himself without a lawyer, later acknowledged assault, criminal damage and harassment.
The work squad is also expected to decline the results from a pilot scheme, as judges wore their Erda in the main family court in London in an attempt to address safety concerns.
The official jilbab tradition has fallen in an attempt to make the family court less intimidated to the litigants, but it was revived in the experimental scheme after it was said that the incidents of violence were “increasing” causing “anxiety” among the judges.
The number of “relatively high” accidents
Sir Andrew McVarlin, the country’s largest family law judge, said that in response to the “relatively high” number of accidents – including knives that are confiscated at the door of the London Court – “Judges’ poetry they want to do something to find out if that would have been Change the perception of those who attended the court.
Judges have been notified that they could issue judicial orders that require the defendant or the witness to prevent him from the court and their presence only by video if the risk evaluation proves that it is the safest approach.
When the courts have sufficient cells and security personnel, the judges were notified that the contempt of the court is a “valuable judicial tool” to manage bad behavior.
“The security training for civilians, the family, the judges, the court and the Koreans is scheduled to be launched and will collect all available directives.”
“Training on scenario -based examples will contain a video of HM Courts and Sucter Service Security explaining their roles, as well as police information about identifying verbal and non -verbal signals.”