Skip to content
Sir Kerr Starmer continues to face the possibility of a major rebellion against luxury discounts despite making concessions to the numbers of disturbing deputies.
The ministers hope that the partial rotation will be sufficient to beat the workers’ rebels when the deputies vote on social care changes on Tuesday.
The concessions included the protection of people who are demanding the payment of personal independence (PIP) from the changes in November 2026, and rowing plans to reduce the health -related element from comprehensive credit.
But Backbench Agtger continued with low heat, with a statement from the Minister of Labor and Pensions Liz Kendall on Monday receiving a negative response.
When asked whether it was “confident” that concessions had done enough to secure the approval of the global independent payment bill and the personal independent loan draft, the Minister of Disability Sir Stephen Tims will tell Sky News only: “I definitely hope it will pass.”
About 126 Labor Party representatives had previously signed a “logical amendment” proposed by the head of the Dame Meg Hillier, who would have stopped the legislation if approved.
This rebellion seemed to have been avoided after Mrs. Meg described the concessions on Friday as a “practical compromise.”
But in the House of Commons on Monday, it was one of the many numerous employees who raised concerns about the proposals of the revised government, while another deputy involved in the negotiations, Deby Abrahams, suggested that the ministers wander around what was agreed upon.
A second amendment was submitted by the draft law by the Central MP of York Rachel Massel with the support of 138 deficit groups, saying that the disabled people “had no agency in this process.”
The Master MASKELL was reported by about 35 Labor Party representatives – much less than 83 needed to cancel the majority of Sir Kiir, but it is sufficient to present the largest rebellion of his accidental focus before the first anniversary of the Work Party winning.
Other MPs are expected to abstain on Tuesday, but they can vote against the draft law next week if there are no other concessions.
One of the main concerns revolves around the PIP review that will be implemented by Sir Stephen and “joint production” with the disabled.
It is not expected to review the report until the fall next year, which makes it difficult to integrate the results he reached into PIP changes due to the occurrence at the same time.
Ms. Abrahams suggested that the timing means that the results of the review were “pre -defined”, while Sarah Owen, the head of another selected committee, warned that she might create a “three -level” system.
Groups, including disability rights in the United Kingdom and the disabled against discounts, criticized the government’s claim that the Sir Stephen review will be “produced” with them and urged the rebels to work.
They said: “The government has made it clear that it is determined to reduce the support that many persons with disabilities depend on and living independently, regardless of the number of people with disabilities who tell them what is the harmful policy that it will be.”
The leader of the Conservative Party, Kimi Badnoush, said that her party’s deputies would vote against the proposals, describing them as “not a serious reform of social welfare,” saying that the ministers “have ridiculed small work.”
The original proposals were expected to provide 4.8 billion pounds by 2030, but Mrs. Kendall revealed on Monday that the revised proposals are likely to provide less than half of this number.