Skip to content
The FBI’s Georgia’s Georgia clients have been asked by their home with flash bombs and firearms from the United States Supreme Court to allow them to prosecute, and to circumvent the typical immunity protection granted to federal employees.
Cyrtrinia “Terina”, Martin, and her seven -year -old son Gabi, and her then Hillard “Toy”, was asleep in peace at their home before dawn on October 18, 2017, when the FBI agents were beaten on their front door and allowed the flash bomb.
Martin, naked from the waist to the bottom, was held at the threat of weapons by agents in her wardrobe and moved away from Gabi, who was roaming under his papers, “terrified”. Cleat was dragged across the ground and handcuffs while there were several agents taking it with firearms.
The FBI’s Undersecretary did not even asked Client to repeat the home address that it had become clear that the ordeal was a mistake.
The agents aim to raid a house similar to four doors. When realized, the agents dismantled Client and left the house to make the raid on the right target. Later, the main agent returned to Martin’s home and colleges to apologize.
But the family suffered from what they call “severe emotional distress” caused by the raid that does not return to the chimneys, which lasts less than five minutes, according to what it mentioned. Washington Post.
“I thought someone was moving, and it was so chaotic that I thought they had a mission, and the mission was to kill us,” Martin told ABC News.
Gabi, 13, said that the experience changed his life and gave him a different perspective of the world.
“I had no childhood that I grew up because of this,” ABC News told ABC News. “So, he really changed me as a person.”
Hoping to obtain compensation and accountability for people, they sued the individual agents who made the raid under the Federal Harm Claims Law – a law that allows lawsuits against the federal government for the harm caused by government employees.
It is one of the rare exceptions for sovereign immunity that the federal government usually benefits from.
Under the law, they filed a lawsuit against the dealerships of the wrong prison, the wrong detention, and the infringement of challenge, assault and neglect among other claims.
Martin lawyers and Cliatt He says The FBI team committed “a neglected and wrong when it raided the incorrect house and claimed it could have been prevented.
But so far, the judges of the minimum court against Martin and Lattat, saying that the agents “made a mistake.”
The Federal Bureau of Investigation in charge of the raid says that he was planned and had previously searched to ensure that the raid went smoothly. This included taking pictures of the home during daylight hours, writing notes on how to make search and distribute pictures to others. Ultimately, the agents got the wrong house during Predawn hours.
The government, which also defends the agents of the FBI, Claims The federal damage law allows people only to prosecute whether the perpetrators are pursuing direct government orders. In this case, the government did not tell the agents to go to Martin’s house and come to me, they were told to go to the right house.
They argue that the ruling in favor of Martin and Latet will open the door for people to file lawsuits against the government for accidents.
During the oral arguments on Tuesday, the judges of the Supreme Court of the Government were interrogated for the extent of protection granted to employees.
“There is no policy that says do not break the wrong door?” Judge Neil Goroush’s request. “Don’t be shocked in passengers? Really?”
Judge Kitanji Brown Jackson agreed with government lawyers to have positions in which the law enforcement should be protected from responsibility, but it was not sure whether it applied to the Martin and Kleit case.